| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
581. You CANT Nerf HighSec! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Garou Carew wrote: The reality is that miners/indutrialists have every right to not trust you, time again your corp and its Null pets have demonstrated that you are not worthy of trust and that nothing that you promote can be taken at face valu...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 22:57:00
|
582. You CANT Nerf HighSec! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malphilos wrote: It's not nothing to do with your little catchphrase meme, and everything to do with the deliberate impression that's been created. The impression miners created was that they were so set in their ways and so risk averse they ...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 22:45:00
|
583. Null is Broken, Hisec working as intended. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
and time is free anyways
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 21:50:00
|
584. You CANT Nerf HighSec! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
There exists this thing called "bringing a t1 mining barge thingy to test the water before actually splurging on the big toys" in such a situation. However, that did involve putting a whole, what, 5-10 million isk on the line. The horror.
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 21:48:00
|
585. Null is Broken, Hisec working as intended. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Peter Raptor wrote: Well .............. just go there with a survey scanner, its pretty easy to prove. Gee I'll move to nullsec because the roids are so big and fat oh whoops I forgot it meant I had to actually pay attention to the game inste...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 21:42:00
|
586. You CANT Nerf HighSec! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
We've lived with station denial since the first outpost was put into nullsec, and it's not causing any problems whatsoever for nullsec. The sov mechanics for taking over a system does cause massive amounts of problems, but the station denial mec...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 21:40:00
|
587. You CANT Nerf HighSec! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: Decrease yield for tanking modules? Spend twos of millions of isk on empty midslots? Heaven forbid they adapt. Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: Pay a 10 mil/month fee to mine in 0.0 where suicide ganking was not a threat?...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 21:28:00
|
588. You CANT Nerf HighSec! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Buzzy Warstl wrote: CCP has implemented a station denial mechanism there that echoes normal sov nullsec rules. It will be interesting to see how it plays out, as there are already hints that it has created an "endgame" for FW. This may or may n...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 21:21:00
|
589. You CANT Nerf HighSec! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: EI Digin wrote: Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: For once, have the BALLS to take responsibility for your actions. Sorry for being the most organized player group ever. Truly, being the best has been our downfall and p...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 21:14:00
|
590. You CANT Nerf HighSec! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: Most likely because that person operates in hi-sec and simply has no experience. And wants to toss concord out the window? Nope, he's not in hisec.
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 21:00:00
|
591. You CANT Nerf HighSec! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
so let's see, I can't be locked out of any assets so there's no incentive to actually fight for space, my stations have some increased capacity, and hisec loses concord. sigh.
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 20:42:00
|
592. You CANT Nerf HighSec! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Buzzy Warstl wrote: Which is why I say it allows for greater rewards. In fact, removing the ability to deny people access to outposts *demands* greater rewards, because it is a risky dynamic for everyone involved. What rewards would you lik...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 20:21:00
|
593. You CANT Nerf HighSec! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Which rewards?
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 20:05:00
|
594. You CANT Nerf HighSec! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Why on earth would anyone try to "do stuff in [your] space", when they can just as well do the same thing in hisec, for less hassle and less risk?
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 20:01:00
|
595. You CANT Nerf HighSec! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Buzzy Warstl wrote: So, anyway, the point is that nullsec needs to be balanced against nullsec, not against highsec. Wrong. Everything's interconnected, and when hisec's as powerful as it is, with nullsec as ****** as it is for industrial typ...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 19:47:00
|
596. "Make smaller better" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quick, someone put a ring in an envelope in the shire.
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 19:37:00
|
597. You CANT Nerf HighSec! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marlona Sky wrote: 99.5%?? I was thinking along the lines of 80% max. It just does not make any sense that someone could build something, melt it back down and have the exact same materials as before. Why?
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 17:20:00
|
598. Null is Broken, Hisec working as intended. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote: Lord Zim wrote: Edit: Actually, nevermind, only dumb people mine roid fields Seems not many people know it. The information about it seems unavailable. But seems obvious to assume, except ladar sites in a...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 16:33:00
|
599. Null is Broken, Hisec working as intended. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
And what's its respawn rate?
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 16:13:00
|
600. "Make smaller better" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Miri Amatonur wrote: All i do is cry to my "gods", the devs of EVE, in the very same way: Give me the means to vanquish my enemies! The only thing you should be crying to your "gods" about, then, would be the sov system, since that's the ma...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.01.03 14:53:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |